The announcement of Jake Paul vs Gervonta “Tank” Davis has stirred a wave of outrage from boxing fans, purists, and analysts alike. Many are calling it a mockery of the sport, an insult to real fighters, and another sign that boxing is becoming more spectacle than sport. But the truth is, boxing didn’t lose its integrity because of Jake Paul — it lost it long before he ever stepped into a ring.
For decades, the sport has been plagued by corruption, mismatched fights, controversial scorecards, and promoters who put profits over competition. From the Don King era to modern sanctioning body politics, boxing has often served the interests of a few powerful players, not the fans or even the athletes.
The outrage over Paul vs Davis ignores this deeper truth: the sport has long rewarded marketability over merit. Fighters have been protected, belts have been devalued, and rankings manipulated to favor those who generate the most revenue. Jake Paul is just a product of the system boxing created — not the one who broke it.
Gervonta Davis, despite his immense talent, has faced criticism for carefully selected opponents and promotional maneuvering. Now, paired against an influencer with a massive following, the backlash says more about the audience’s short memory than the fight itself.
Selective outrage only scratches the surface. If boxing wants to regain credibility, it needs more than criticism of YouTube boxers — it needs reform from the ground up.
